Can can a changing criterion design be used to evaluate shaping programs? Well, PTB founder Dana Meller says, it depends.
Dana Do’s: Can Changing Criterion Design be Used to Evaluate Shaping Programs? Read More
Which chaining method goes with which behavior? Dana Meller offers some considerations that may help you answer that question on the exam.
Refer to BCBA® Task List (5th ed.) Section Section G-8: Use chaining.
Dana Do’s: Chain Chain Chain, Chain, Chain… Read More
PTB founder Dana Meller clarifies confusion to explain derived stimulus relation vs. stimulus equivalence.
Dana Do’s: Clarifying Confusion Between Derived Stimulus Relation and Stimulus Equivalence Read More
Shaping and chaining are strategies for teaching complex behaviors that are often confused. PTB founder Dana Meller makes the differences clear.
Dana Do’s: Clearing Up the Confusion Over Shaping and Chaining Read More
Punishment is known to have a quick impact on behavior, but there are ethical implications which makes it very controversial. PTB founder Dana Meller offers some considerations when encountering exam questions related to punishment.
Dana Do’s: Considerations for Exam Questions Related to the Use of Punishment Read More
You know how the textbooks say that there are two parts to differential reinforcement, one being reinforcement for the desired behavior and the other extinction for the target behavior? Applying
Dana Do’s: Fun Fact About Using DRA Read More
PTB co-founder Dana Meller explains how to use Multiple Exemplar training to improve your exam application skills.
BCBA® Task List (5th ed.) Section: G-21 Use procedures to promote stimulus and response generalization.
Dana Do’s: How to Get Unstuck When Studying for the BCBA® Read More
If all prompts prompt behavior, how can you tell the different between stimulus and response prompts? PTB co-founder Dana Meller simplifies it with one word.
Refer to BCBA® Task List (5th ed.) Section G-4: Use stimulus and response prompts and fading (e.g., errorless, most-to-least, least-to-most, prompt delay, stimulus fading).
Dana Do’s: If All Prompts Prompt Behavior, What’s the Difference? Read More
PTB co-founder Dana Meller shares a trick for discriminating between response and stimulus prompts.
BCBA® Task List (5th ed.) Section G-4: Use stimulus and response prompts and fading (e.g., errorless, most-to-least, least-to-most, prompt delay, stimulus fading)
Dana Do’s: Need a Prompt to Understand Prompting? Read More
Relating, framing and equating. PTB co-founder Dana Meller drills into the generalizability of relational frame theory, equivalence-based instruction, and stimulus equivalence. Would you believe they all go together?
Refer to BCBA® Task List (5th ed.) Sections B-15: Define and provide examples of derived stimulus relations; G-21: Use procedures to promote stimulus and response generalization; G-12: Use equivalence-based instruction.
Dana Do’s: Relating, Framing and Equating Read More
Want an easy way to make the correct discrimination between response blocking and extinction? PTB co-founder Dana Meller borrows from the #starwars universe to help explain.
BCBA® Task List (5th ed.) Section: G-16 Use positive and negative punishment (e.g., time-out, response cost, overcorrection).
Dana Do’s: Response Blocking vs. Extinction Read More
The books don’t really say much about what chaining methods BCBA’s should apply to what behaviors. PTB co-founder Dana Meller breaks it down.
Refer to BCBA® Task List (5th ed.) Section G-8: Use chaining.
Dana Do’s: What Chaining Method to Use When? Read More